<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Workflow on Seunghoon Choi</title><link>https://seunghoonchoi.com/tags/workflow/</link><description>Recent content in Workflow on Seunghoon Choi</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://seunghoonchoi.com/tags/workflow/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>What Matters More Than Study Smarts: Four Fundamentals That Matter More as AI Gets Better</title><link>https://seunghoonchoi.com/column/six-fundamentals/</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://seunghoonchoi.com/column/six-fundamentals/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://seunghoonchoi.com/images/col-six-fundamentals.jpg" alt="A climber chalking their hands in front of a difficult rock wall"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="inline-image-caption"&gt;The faster AI gets, the more basic skills matter. A person still has to check whether the AI answer is right, what it missed, and whether it can be used as-is.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AI now summarizes, translates, drafts reports, and even writes code. Does that make study smarts less important? I think the opposite is true.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Memorization and repetitive calculation may matter less. But the ability to read sentences, understand how work moves, organize multiple pieces of information into structure, and handle invisible concepts matters more. The faster AI produces outputs, the more important the human fundamentals become for judging whether those outputs are right or wrong.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>