<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Knowledge Structuring on Seunghoon Choi</title><link>https://seunghoonchoi.com/tags/knowledge-structuring/</link><description>Recent content in Knowledge Structuring on Seunghoon Choi</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://seunghoonchoi.com/tags/knowledge-structuring/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Why I Cannot Explain the Report AI Wrote for Me: What Missing Background Knowledge Is</title><link>https://seunghoonchoi.com/column/context-debt/</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://seunghoonchoi.com/column/context-debt/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://seunghoonchoi.com/images/col-context-debt.jpg" alt="An old city map spread on a table, full of alleys but with no main roads marked"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="inline-image-caption"&gt;If the author cannot explain a report created by AI, the author will only act as a messenger and not the person in charge of the document.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You feed material to AI and ask it to write a report. A few seconds later a plausible document appears. It has a title, background, key points, and a conclusion. Sentence by sentence it looks quite decent. Then you walk into a meeting and someone asks:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>